Gail Farber has been committed to environmental issues since gaining her position as the current director of the LA Department of Public Works. From plastic bag bans to proposals of having home owners pay tariffs to keep water clean, Farber has made environmental issues central to her director position. However, it appears Farber's DPW was central in the decision to remove tree from unincorporated areas. But does this really fit with her pro-environmental agenda? Many residents disagree.
Many of the trees removed were ficus trees, although a variety of species have been removed. Interestingly enough, most cities fight to protect their trees, but apparently Farber's fight for the environment ends when the issue of tree sustainability begins. Ficus trees are gorgeous, lush trees, but they also tend to harm sidewalks with their vast root systems. Most communities simply prune the roots of the trees. A quick Google search shows proof that ficus trees can be managed properly so as to not ruin sidewalks.
Trees provide a win-win for everybody. Residents get to live on tree-lined streets which boosts the attractiveness of the neighborhood, has many functional aspects to existing residents, and is a selling point in the real estate market. A beautiful neighborhood improves home prices which is a positive for home owners and the local governments alike.
Functionally, trees provide a natural sound and wind barrier. They also help residents to save on energy and water costs. Lush trees like the ficus have a large crown, therefore, grass is protected from the direct sun so less watering is required. The big crown protects homes from direct sunlight, which helps keep the home cool and allows residents to save on the costs of running AC units and fans.
Further, trees are home to a variety of animals. Hawks, crows, doves, sparrows, squirrels, and other assorted species seek refuge in the trees of ECV. Again, lush trees like the ficus provide great protection for these animals and they often seek to nest in these trees. However, the city of LA has been prone to putting smaller variety of trees that lack the ability to adequately protect from heat whilst also failing to provide a suitable home for wildlife.
Farber's DPW has not only hurt the aesthetic of the neighborhood of El Camino Village, but has forced residents to use more energy and water whilst also forcing native wildlife to seek new homes.
Fun fact: Gail's salary as a public servant is a cool $230,000 courtesy of taxpayers. What has she done for you, El Camino Village?
No comments:
Post a Comment